Mar 05

Can You Purchase Stock in a Personal Business with Your 401k?

Yes. The Internal Revenue Code and ERISA have firmly codified the ability to use retirement funds to invest in the stock of a sponsoring company as long as certain IRS and ERISA rules are followed.  One way to use 401(k) funds to invest in a business is by utilizing the Rollover as Business Startup, or ROBS.

Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(c) includes a list of transactions that the IRS deems “prohibited”. However, Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d) lists a number of exemptions to the prohibited transaction rules. Specifically Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d)(13) lists an exemption for any transaction which is exempt from section 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by reason of Section 408(e) of such Act.

ERISA Section 408(e) provides that ERISA Section 406 shall not apply to the purchase by the Plan of qualifying employer securities (as defined in ERISA Section 407(d)(5)), provided that: (1) the acquisition or sale is for adequate consideration; (2) no commission is charged with respect to the acquisition or sale; and (3) the plan is an eligible individual account plan (as defined in ERISA Section 407(d)(3)). A 401(k) plan fits in to this definition.

Pursuant to ERISA Section 406, the acquisition or sale must be for “adequate consideration”. Except in the case of a “marketable obligation”, adequate consideration for this purpose means a price not less favorable than the price determined under ERISA Section 3(18), subject to a requirement that the acquisition or sale must be for “adequate consideration,” An exchange of company stock between the plan and its employer-sponsor would be a prohibited transaction, unless the requirements of ERISA Section 408(e) are met.

The exemptions in Internal Revenue Code 4975(d) shall not apply to items described in Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(f)(6). Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(f)(6)(A)) states that the exemption of Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d) shall not apply i n the case of a trust described in Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a), which is part of a plan providing contributions or benefits for employees Can You Purchase Stock in a Personal Business with Your 401k?some or all of whom are owner-employees (other than paragraphs (9) and (12)) shall not apply to a transaction in which the plan directly or indirectly— (i) lends any part of the corpus or income of the plan to, (ii) pays any compensation for personal services rendered to the plan to, or ( iii) acquires for the plan any property from or sells any property to, any such owner-employee, a member of the family of any such owner-employee, or any corporation in which any such owner-employee owns, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or 50 percent or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of the corporation. Therefore, since the Plan will be purchasing “qualified employer securities” directly from the newly formed corporation, the purchase of corporate stock will not be treated as a prohibited transaction pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 4975.

ERISA Section 407(b)(1) generally places limitations on the acquisition and holding of Qualifying Employer Securities (normally 10% of plan assets). However, the Section includes an exception for “eligible individual account plans” (ERISA 407(b)(1)). As set forth in ERISA Section 407(d)(3), a qualified profit sharing plan is included in the definition of “eligible individual account plans”. In addition, pursuant to ERISA Section 404(a)(2), these plans do not violate ERISA’s diversification and, to the extent it requires diversification, prudence requirements.

The IRA Financial Group’s retirement tax professionals will work with you directly to develop an IRS and ERISA fully compliant business acquisition or funding solution customized to your individual business, financial, and retirement needs.

For more information about using your 401(k) to invest in a business, please contact us @ 800.472.0646.

IRA Financial Group Facebook pageIRA Financial Group Twitter pageamazon-logoIRA Financial Group Tumblr pageIRA Financial Group Pinterest page

Feb 20

The Legality of the Individual 401k Plan

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( ERISA) ( Pub.L. 93-406, 88  Stat. 829, enacted September 2, 1974) is an American federal statute that establishes minimum standards for pension plans in private industry and provides for extensive rules on the federal income tax effects of transactions associated with employee benefit plans. ERISA contained sweeping changes in the regulation of pension plans, and created rules regarding reporting and disclosure, funding, vesting, and fiduciary duties. Although ERISA was aimed mostly at “assuring the equitable character” and “financial soundness” of pension plans, the Act contained numerous provisions impacting plans (like profit-sharing plans, and eventually 401(k) plans). For example, ERISA contained a provision that allowed plans to delegate investment responsibility to participants and thereby relieve the plan sponsor from investment responsibility, which today is the basis for participant-directed 401(k) plans.

In 1978, Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding section 401(k), whereby employees are not taxed on income they choose to receive as deferred compensation rather than direct compensation. The law went into effect on January 1, 1980. Although a tax code provision permitting cash or deferred arrangements (CODAs) was added in 1978 as Section 401(k), it was not until November 10, 1981 that the IRS formally described the rules for these plans.

The Legality of the Individual 401k PlanThe “one-participant 401(k) plan”, also known as an “Individual 401(k) plan” is an IRS approved type of qualified plan, which is suited for business owners who do not have any employees, other than themselves and perhaps their spouse. The “one-participant 401(k) plan” is not a new type of plan. It is a traditional 401(k) plan covering only one employee. The plans have the same rules and requirements as any other 401(k) plan. The surging interest in these plans is a result of the EGTRRA tax law change that became effective in 2002. The law changed how salary deferral contributions are treated when calculating the maximum deduction limits for contributions to a 401(k) plan. This change created an opportunity for some people to put away additional amounts toward their retirement.

It was not until the late 1990s that the regulatory climate began to change for 401(k) plans. In 1996, as part of a package of reforms aimed at bolstering small businesses— the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (SBJPA) , Congress acted to encourage employers to offer retirement plans, including 401(k) plans. The SBJPA simplified nondiscrimination tests and repealed rules imposing limits on the contributions that could be made to a retirement plan by an employee that also participated in a DB plan. In addition, starting in the late 1990s, the IRS issued a series of rulings allowing automatic enrollment.

The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) contained many provisions that affected qualified retirement plans in a positive way. Two of the most significant changes were the increase in the maximum salary deferral amount for 401(k) plans along with a “catch-up” contribution and the ability to receive an allocation under the plan.

According to the IRS, there are approximately one million private retirement plans covering over 99 million participants.

IRS Publication 560 sets forth the general rules pertaining to a small business retirement plan, such as a Solo 401(k) Plan.

For additional information on the legality of the Solo 401(k) Plan, please contact one of our 401(k) Experts at 800-472-0646.

IRA Financial Group Facebook pageIRA Financial Group Twitter pageamazon-logoIRA Financial Group Tumblr pageIRA Financial Group Pinterest page

Jun 02

History of the Solo 401k Plan

401(k) plans are named after the section of the Internal Revenue Code in which they appear, and apply to private sector employers. A solo 401(k) plan, also called an individual 401(k), a one-participant plan, self-employed 401(k) or self-directed 401(k) plan is a qualified retirement plan that was designed specifically for the self-employed or small business owner with no employees. To many peoples surprise, the solo 401(k) plan is not a new type of retirement plan. The solo 401(k) plan is not a term of art or even fond in the Internal Revenue Code. The Solo 401(k) Plan, in general, has the same rules and requirements as company 401(k) plan, but is not subject to the complex ERISA rules which make employee 401(k) plans so costly. In other words, the solo 401(k) Plan is simply a 401(k) plan that is not subject to the ERISA rules because the adopting employer does not have any full-time employees, other than their spouse(s). The growth in the popularity of the solo 401(k) plan began with the enactment of the Economic Growth and Tax Reconciliation Relief Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) which armed the solo 401(k) plan with all the attractive features of the better known employer 401(k) plan.

The Solo 401K Plan has become the most popular retirement plan for the self-employed. This is exactly what the IRS envisioned when it created the Solo 401K Plan, also known as the Individual 401K or Self-Directed 401K Plan.

Pre-1978 – Deferred compensation arrangements (“cash or deferred arrangements,” known as CODAs) which allowed some compensation (and resulting tax liability) to be deferred, predate 401(k) plans by several decades and are viewed as their precursors.

In the 1950s, a number of companies, particularly banks, added to their profit-sharing plans a new feature that came to be called a “cash or deferred arrangement,” or CODA. Each year, when employees were awarded profit-sharing bonuses, they were given the option to deposit some or all of the bonus into the plan instead of receiving the bonus in cash. Even though the employee had the right to receive the bonus in cash, which normally would trigger immediate income tax, a CODA sought to treat any amount the employee contributed to the plan as if it were an employer contribution, and therefore tax-deferred.

In 1956, the IRS issued the first in a series of rulings allowing profit-sharing plans to include a CODA and still be eligible for the favorable tax treatment accorded employer contributions.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) contained sweeping changes in the regulation of pension plans, and created rules regarding reporting and disclosure, funding, vesting, and fiduciary duties. Although ERISA was aimed mostly at “assuring the equitable character” and “financial soundness” of Defined Benefit pension plans, the Act contained numerous provisions impacting Defined Contribution plans (like profit-sharing plans, and eventually 401(k) plans).

In 1962, after much deliberation, Congress enacted the Self-Employed Individuals Tax Retirement Act of 1962, extending some of the benefits of qualified plan participation to self-employed persons. Plans covering self-employed individuals were often called Keogh or H.R. 10 plans, after the principal sponsor and bill number in the House of Representatives.

The 1962 legislation required plans covering self-employed individuals to satisfy all of the qualification criteria for plans covering only common law employees and imposed numerous additional requirements and limitations.

Is the Solo 401(k) Plan Subject to ERISA?

The DOL regulations provide that a plan that covers only partners or a sole proprietor is not covered under Title I of ERISA. Pursuant to Department of Labor Regulations 2510.3-3(c) –

(1) An individual and his or her spouse shall not be deemed to be employees with respect to a trade or business, whether incorporated or unincorporated, which is wholly owned by the individual or by the individual and his or her spouse, an

(2) A partner in a partnership and his or her spouse shall not be deemed to be employees with respect to the partnership.

The provisions of Title I of ERISA, which are administered by the U.S. Department of Labor, were enacted to address public concern that funds of private pension plans were being mismanaged and abused. ERISA was the culmination of a long line of legislation concerned with the labor and tax aspects of employee benefit plans. The goal of Title I of ERISA is to protect the interests of participants and their beneficiaries in employee benefit plans.

The provisions of Title I of ERISA cover most private sector employee benefit plans. Employee benefit plans are voluntarily established and maintained by an employer, an employee organization, or jointly by one or more such employers and an employee organization. Pension plans–a type of employee benefit plan–are established and maintained to provide retirement income or to defer income until termination of covered employment or beyond. Other employee benefit plans are called welfare plans and are established and maintained to provide health benefits, disability benefits, death benefits, prepaid legal services, vacation benefits, day care centers, scholarship funds, apprenticeship and training benefits, or other similar benefits.

History of the Solo 401k PlanIn general, ERISA does not cover plans established or maintained by governmental entities or churches for their employees, or plans which are maintained solely to comply with applicable workers compensation, unemployment or disability laws. ERISA also does not cover plans maintained outside the United States primarily for the benefit of nonresident aliens or unfunded excess benefit plans. In addition, ERISA does not cover plans involving self-employed business owners or entity’s with no full-time employees other than the business owner(s) and spouses(s) since the goal of Title I of ERISA is to protect the interests of participants and their beneficiaries in employee benefit plans of owners, for plans that only cover owners, there is no need for ERISA since there are no non-owner employees to protect.

Even though a solo 401(k) plan is not subject to Title 1 of ERISA, the ERISA rules are still looked at as a reference because a solo 401(k) Plan is still a qualified retirement plan.

1978 – The Revenue Act of 1978 included a provision that became Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sec. 401(k) (for which the plans are named), under which employees are not taxed on the portion of income they elect to receive as deferred compensation rather than as direct cash payments. The Revenue Act of 1978 added permanent provisions to the IRC, sanctioning the use of salary reductions as a source of plan contributions. The law went into effect on Jan. 1, 1980. Regulations were issued in November of 1981.

1981 – The IRS issued proposed regulations on 401(k) plans that sanctioned the use of employee salary reductions as a source of retirement plan contributions. Many employers replaced older, after-tax thrift plans with 401(k)s and added 401(k) options to profit-sharing and stock bonus plans.

Although a tax code provision permitting cash or deferred arrangements (CODAs) was added in 1978 as Section 401(k), it was not until November 10, 1981 that the IRS formally described the rules for these plans. In the years immediately following the issuance of these rules, large employers typically offered 401(k) plans as supplements to their Defined Benefit plans, with few employers offering them to employees as stand-alone retirement plans. November 10, 1981 marks the birth of the modern 401(k) plan. After that date, companies began to add 401(k) contributions to their profit-sharing plans, convert after-tax thrift-savings plans to 401(k) plans, or create new 401(k)-type DC plans.

Within two years, surveys showed that nearly half of all large firms were either already offering a 401(k) plan or considering one.

Over the years, most notably in 1974 and 1981, the rules for plans covering self-employed individuals were liberalized and elaborated, and rules applicable to all plans, including those covering only common law employees, were tightened by subjecting them to some of the restrictions originally applicable only to plans covering self-employed persons.

In 1982, Congress adopted a unified system for all qualified plans, including those covering self-employed persons, finding the logic of a unified system so obvious that only a single sentence was sufficient to justify the change: “Congress believed that the level of tax incentives made available to encourage an employer to provide retirement benefits to employees should generally not depend upon whether the employer is an incorporated or unincorporated enterprise.

In 2001, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (EGTRRA) took another step to spur saving through 401(k) and other DC plans. EGTRRA increased the annual Defined Contribution plan contribution limit, albeit not higher than the $45,475 limit in place in 1982. In addition, the restrictions placed on employee deferrals were loosened as the limit on pre-tax contributions was increased and additional “catch-up” contributions were allowed for employees age 50 and older. With the goal of preserving retirement accounts even when job changes occur, EGTRRA increased the opportunities for rollovers among various savings vehicles (401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, 457 plans, and IRAs). In addition, EGTRRA permitted 401(k) plans to offer a “Roth” feature for after-tax contributions.

Prior to 2002, most self-employed individuals tended to use a SEP IRA or SIMPLE IRA as a retirement vehicle. However, in 2002 the Economic Growth and Tax Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) became effective and generally provided the small business owner with no employees or the self-employed the same advantages/benefits of a conventional 401(k) Plan.

EGTRRA include various reforms that contributed to the growing popularity of the Solo 401(k) Plan versus the SEP IRA and SIMPLE IRA. Below is a list of several key EGTRRA provisions that led to growth in popularity of the Solo 401(k) Plan:

1. EGTRRA increased the deductible profit sharing contribution limit from 15 percent to 25 percent of employees compensation and changed the application of deferrals so that they are not counted against the employer’s maximum deductible contribution amount.

2. EGTRRA increased the annual contribution limit per plan participant to the lesser of an annual maximum dollar amount of 100 percent of the participant’s compensation. Prior to EGTTRA, an eligible participant of a Solo 401(k) Plan was not eligible to make employee deferrals.

3. EGTRRA created the designated Roth contribution option for 401(k) and 403(b) plans. This provision allowed plan participants to designate all or a portion of their employee deferrals as Roth (after-tax) contributions.

EGTRRA modified Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(f)(6) to allow for the expansion of the loan feature to apply to unincorporated business (a sole proprietorship). Legislation passed in August 2006, the Pension Protection Act (PPA), also aims to foster retirement savings and 401(k) plan participation. Among its many provisions, the Act makes the EGTRRA pension rule changes permanent and, additionally, makes some of the rules governing pension plans more flexible. For example, the PPA encourages employers to automatically enroll employees in their 401(k) plans and allows employers to offer appropriate default investments. These measures seek to increase participation in 401(k) plans and facilitate the best use of these plans’ options by workers.

The marketing for this type of plan is aimed at business owners who do not have any employees, other than themselves and perhaps their spouse. Many of the advantages of these Solo 401K plan generally vanish if the employer expands the business and hires more employees since the employer would now be required to adopt a conventional Solo 401K Plan and must include the new employee(s) in the plan. No matter what the plan is called, it must meet the rules of the Internal Revenue Code. If employees are hired and they meet the eligibility requirements of the plan and the Code, they must be included.

Thus, the Solo 401K Plan is an IRS approved plan that was initially established into law in 1962 but was greatly enhanced by the 2002 EGTRRA law. Now, the Solo 401K Plan is the most popular retirement plan for the self-employed or small business owner.

As of 2013, The 401(k) plan retirement system now holds $2.8 trillion in assets on behalf of more than 50 million active participants and millions of former employees and retirees. The number of workers covered by 401(k) plans continues to expand, which has been a result of rules attempted to encourage more employers, small and large, to open 401(k) plans by making them as simple and accessible as possible.

To learn more about the advantages of using a Solo 401(k) Plan, please contact one of our Solo 401(k) Plan experts at 800-472-0646 for more information.

IRA Financial Group Facebook pageIRA Financial Group Twitter pageamazon-logoIRA Financial Group Tumblr pageIRA Financial Group Pinterest page

Nov 25

Does the IRS Allow the Use of 401k Funds to Purchase Stock in a Business I Will be Involved in?

Yes, you may use your 401(k) funds to purchase stock in a business you will be involved in. The Internal Revenue Code and ERISA have firmly codified the ability to use retirement funds to invest in the stock of a sponsoring company as long as certain IRS and ERISA rules are followed.

Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(c) includes a list of transactions that the IRS deems “prohibited”. However, Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d) lists a number of exemptions to the prohibited transaction rules. Specifically Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d)(13) lists an exemption for any transaction which is exempt from section 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by reason of Section 408(e) of such Act.

ERISA Section 408(e) provides that ERISA Section 406 shall not apply to the purchase by the Plan of qualifying employer securities (as defined in ERISA Section 407(d)(5)), provided that: (1) the acquisition or sale is for adequate consideration; (2) no commission is charged with respect to the acquisition or sale; and (3) the plan is an eligible individual account plan (as defined in ERISA Section 407(d)(3)). A 401(k) plan fits in to this definition.

Pursuant to ERISA Section 406, the acquisition or sale must be for “adequate consideration”. Except in the case of a “marketable obligation”, adequate consideration for this purpose means a price not less favorable than the price determined under ERISA Section 3(18), subject to a requirement that the acquisition or sale must be for “adequate consideration,” An exchange of company stock between the plan and its employer-sponsor would be a prohibited transaction, unless the requirements of ERISA Section 408(e) are met.

Does the IRS Allow the Use of 401k Funds to Purchase Stock in a Business I Will be Involved in?The exemptions in Internal Revenue Code 4975(d) shall not apply to items described in Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(f)(6). Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(f)(6)(A)) states that the exemption of Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d) shall not apply i n the case of a trust described in Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a), which is part of a plan providing contributions or benefits for employees some or all of whom are owner-employees (other than paragraphs (9) and (12)) shall not apply to a transaction in which the plan directly or indirectly— (i) lends any part of the corpus or income of the plan to, (ii) pays any compensation for personal services rendered to the plan to, or ( iii) acquires for the plan any property from or sells any property to, any such owner-employee, a member of the family of any such owner-employee, or any corporation in which any such owner-employee owns, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or 50 percent or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of the corporation. Therefore, since the Plan will be purchasing “qualified employer securities” directly from the newly formed corporation, the purchase of corporate stock will not be treated as a prohibited transaction pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 4975.

ERISA Section 407(b)(1) generally places limitations on the acquisition and holding of Qualifying Employer Securities (normally 10% of plan assets). However, the Section includes an exception for “eligible individual account plans” (ERISA 407(b)(1)). As set forth in ERISA Section 407(d)(3), a qualified profit sharing plan is included in the definition of “eligible individual account plans”. In addition, pursuant to ERISA Section 404(a)(2), these plans do not violate ERISA’s diversification and, to the extent it requires diversification, prudence requirements.

The IRA Financial Group’s retirement tax professionals will work with you directly to develop an IRS and ERISA fully compliant business acquisition or funding solution customized to your individual business, financial, and retirement needs.  Contact us today @ 800.472.0646!

IRA Financial Group Facebook pageIRA Financial Group Twitter pageamazon-logoIRA Financial Group Tumblr pageIRA Financial Group Pinterest page

Nov 24

Solo 401(k) Plans and ERISA

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( ERISA) ( Pub.L. 93-406, 88  Stat. 829, enacted September 2, 1974) is an American federal statute that establishes minimum standards for pension plans in private industry and provides for extensive rules on the federal income tax effects of transactions associated with employee benefit plans. ERISA contained sweeping changes in the regulation of pension plans, and created rules regarding reporting and disclosure, funding, vesting, and fiduciary duties. Although ERISA was aimed mostly at “assuring the equitable character” and “financial soundness” of pension plans, the Act contained numerous provisions impacting plans (like profit-sharing plans, and eventually 401(k) plans). For example, ERISA contained a provision that allowed plans to delegate investment responsibility to participants and thereby relieve the plan sponsor from investment responsibility, which today is the basis for participant-directed 401(k) plans.

In 1978, Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding section 401(k), whereby employees are not taxed on income they choose to receive as deferred compensation rather than direct compensation. The law went into effect on January 1, 1980. Although a tax code provision permitting cash or deferred arrangements (CODAs) was added in 1978 as Section 401(k), it was not until November 10, 1981 that the IRS formally described the rules for these plans.

Solo 401(k) Plans and ERISAThe “one-participant 401(k) plan” is an IRS approved type of qualified plan, which is suited for business owners who do not have any employees, other than themselves and perhaps their spouse. The “one-participant 401(k) plan” is not a new type of plan. It is a traditional 401(k) plan covering only one employee. The plans have the same rules and requirements as any other 401(k) plan. The surging interest in these plans is a result of the EGTRRA tax law change that became effective in 2002. The law changed how salary deferral contributions are treated when calculating the maximum deduction limits for contributions to a 401(k) plan. This change created an opportunity for some people to put away additional amounts toward their retirement.

It was not until the late 1990s that the regulatory climate began to change for 401(k) plans. In 1996, as part of a package of reforms aimed at bolstering small businesses— the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (SBJPA) , Congress acted to encourage employers to offer retirement plans, including 401(k) plans. The SBJPA simplified nondiscrimination tests and repealed rules imposing limits on the contributions that could be made to a retirement plan by an employee that also participated in a DB plan. In addition, starting in the late 1990s, the IRS issued a series of rulings allowing automatic enrollment.

The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) contained many provisions that affected qualified retirement plans in a positive way. Two of the most significant changes were the increase in the maximum salary deferral amount for 401(k) plans along with a “catch-up” contribution and the ability to receive an allocation under the plan.

According to the IRS, there are approximately one million private retirement plans covering over 99 million participants.

IRS Publication 560 sets forth the general rules pertaining to a small business retirement plan, such as a Solo 401(k) Plan.

For additional information on the legality of the Solo 401(k) Plan, please contact one of our 401(k) Experts at 800-472-0646.

IRA Financial Group Facebook pageIRA Financial Group Twitter pageamazon-logoIRA Financial Group Tumblr pageIRA Financial Group Pinterest page

Mar 27

The Law Regarding the Use of a 401k to Fund a Business

The Internal Revenue Code and ERISA have firmly codified the ability to use retirement funds to invest in the stock of a sponsoring company as long as certain IRS and ERISA rules are followed.

Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(c) includes a list of transactions that the IRS deems “prohibited”. However, Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d) lists a number of exemptions to the prohibited transaction rules. Specifically Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(d)(13) lists an exemption for any transaction which is exempt from section 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by reason of section 408(e) of such Act.

Section 408(e) provides that section 406 shall not apply to the acquisition or sale by a plan of qualifying employer securities (as defined in section 407(d)(5), provided that: (1) the acquisition or sale is for adequate consideration; (2) no commission is charged with respect to the acquisition or sale; and (3) the plan is an eligible individual account plan (as defined in section 407(d)(3)). A 401(k) plan fits in to this definition.

The Law Regarding the Use of a 401k to Fund a BusinessPursuant to ERISA Section 406, the acquisition or sale must be for “adequate consideration.” Except in the case of a “marketable obligation”, adequate consideration for this purpose means a price not less favorable than the price determined under ERISA § 3(18),subject to a requirement that the acquisition or sale must be for “adequate consideration.” An exchange of company stock between the plan and its employer-sponsor would be a prohibited transaction, unless the requirements of ERISA § 408(e) are met.

The exemptions in 4975(d) shall not apply to items described in Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(f)(6). Section 4975(f)(6)(A) states that the exemption of 4975(d) shall not apply in the case of a trust described in Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a), which is part of a plan providing contributions or benefits for employees some or all of whom are owner-employees (other than paragraphs (9) and (12)) shall not apply to a transaction in which the plan directly or indirectly— (i) lends any part of the corpus or income of the plan to, (ii) pays any compensation for personal services rendered to the plan to, or (iii) acquires for the plan any property from or sells any property to, any such owner-employee, a member of the family of any such owner-employee, or any corporation in which any such owner-employee owns, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or 50 percent or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of the corporation. Therefore, since the Plan will be purchasing “qualified employer securities” directly from the newly formed corporation, the purchase of corporate stock will not be treated as a prohibited transaction pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 4975.

ERISA Section 407(b)(1) generally places limitations on the acquisition and holding of Qualifying Employer Securities (normally 10% of plan assets). However, the Section includes an exception for “eligible individual account plans” (ERISA 407(b)(1)). As set forth in ERISA Section 407(d)(3), a qualified profit sharing plan is included in the definition of “eligible individual account plans”. In addition, pursuant to ERISA Section 404(a)(2), these plans do not violate ERISA’s diversification and, to the extent it requires diversification, prudence requirements.

Call us today at 800-472-0646 to learn more about how you can use your retirement funds to start a new business or grow an existing business tax-free, in full IRS compliance, and without penalties!

IRA Financial Group Facebook pageIRA Financial Group Twitter pageIRA Financial Group Tumblr pageIRA Financial Group Pinterest page